Abordaje criminal?stico y penal de los hechos de tr?nsito

 

Authors

Guti?rrez Robayo, Orlando

Format

Article

Status

publishedVersion

Description

Distintos episodios de siniestralidad vial (hechos de tr?nsito) a los que se suma decisiones judiciales a favor de la libertad de conductores imputados de delitos cometidos con ocasi?n de la conducci?n de un automotor son, en gran medida, los factores que obran de disparador de normatividad. Lo que se pretende es suministrar alguna soluci?n a todos los conflictos sociales, o cuanto menos, a los que se considera m?s importantes, aunque en la realidad no lo sean. De este modo, el derecho penal -otrora entendido como de m?nima intervenci?n-, avanza hacia una penalizaci?n indiscriminada de conductas que, en muchos casos, ni siquiera ponen en riesgo un determinado bien jur?dico. Ante la ocurrencia de un hecho criminal (o no criminal, pero que la sociedad reclama que lo sea) de gran impacto social, observamos una inmediata reacci?n de la pol?tica pregonando a los cuatro vientos la reforma penal para solucionar r?pidamente el conflicto, ya sea modificando y creando nuevas normas como agravantes punitivos, particularmente sometidos a una severa penalidad o bien endureciendo las penas de tipos penales ya existentes, pretendiendo con ello brindar soluciones por lo general meramente simb?licas o formales, m?s orientadas a calmar la voracidad popular que a dar una real soluci?n al conflicto social.
Different episodes of road accidents (traffic events) to which judicial decisions are added in favor of the freedom of drivers charged with crimes committed on the occasion of driving a car and the persistent claims of Civil Associations to incorporate the so-called Criminal Code Traffic offenses are, to a large extent, the factors that act as a trigger for regulations. What is intended is to provide some solution to all social conflicts, or at least, to those considered most important, although in reality they are not. In this way, criminal law - another understood as minimal intervention - is moving towards an indiscriminate criminalization of behaviors that, in many cases, do not even put at risk a certain legal good. Given the occurrence of a criminal act (or not criminal, but that society claims it to be) of great social impact, we observe an immediate reaction of the policy by calling the four winds the criminal reform to quickly resolve the conflict, whether creating new criminal types of suspicious constitutionality, particularly subject to a severe penalty or hardening penalties of already existing criminal types, thereby seeking to provide solutions usually merely symbolic or formal, more oriented to calm popular voracity than to give a real solution to social conflict.

Publication Year

2020

Language

spa

Topic

Tr?nsito
Principios
Criminal?stica
Primer responsable
Funciones

Repository

RI de la Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología

Get full text

https://repositorio.umecit.edu.pa/handle/001/4149
https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n12.378
https://repositorio.umecit.edu.pa/

Rights

openAccess

License

Atribuci?n-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)